Monday, 7 March 2011

Revised Term Paper Outline

PURPOSE:  What is the main reason that caused women to take part in the French Revolution?

THESIS:  Women took part in the French Revolution primarily because of writings like Olympe de Gouges's Declaration on the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen and Nicolas de Condorcet's On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship; if not for women being educated by such publications, they would not have been inspired to participate in the revolution alongside the men.

DEFINITIONS:
Olympe de Gouges
Marquis and Sophie Concordet
Mary Wollstonecraft
Etta Palm d'Aelders

TYPES OF SOURCES:
Primary Sources:  June 20, 1789: Tennis Court Oath;  August 27, 1789: Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizen; 1793: Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen; 1795: Declaration of Rights and Duties of Man and Citizen; Nicolas de Concordet, July 1790: On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship;  Olympe de Gouge, 1791: Declaration on the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen;  Mary Wollstonecraft, 1792:  A Vindication of the Rights of Woman;  Various Revolutionary Pamphlets;  Various Protestant Reformation Pamphlets;  1789: List of Grievances and Claims of Women; Lequino, February 17, 1792: Plea for Divorce and Women's Freedom; Guyomar, April 29, 1793:  National Convention Speech on Women's Rights; Etta Palm d'Aelders, December 30, 1790: Discourse on the Injustice of the Laws in Favor of Men, at the Expense of Women;  Paris, France, October 5, 1789: Engraving of the Women's March on Versailles; July 9, 1793:  Regulations of the Society of Revolutionary Women;
Secondary Sources:  N/A at this current point in time

OUTLINE:
A.  Background on the French Revolution
      1.  Tennis Court Oath
      2.  National Assembly
B.  Documents for the Rights of Men
      1. "Men are born free and remain free and equal in rights," (Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen 1789)
      2.  "No one shall be disquieted on account of his opinions, including his religious views, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law," (Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen 1789)
      3.  "The aim of the society is the common welfare," (Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen 1793)
      4. "The rights of man in society are liberty, equality, security, property," (Declaration of Rights and Duties of Man and Citizen 1795)
C.  On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship
      1.  Condorcet: A man who also believes that women deserve equal rights
      2.  Believed that women were certainly capable of exercising the same rights as men
      3.  "Is there a stronger proof of the power of habit even among enlightened men than seeing the principle of equality of rights invoked in favor of three or four hundred men deprived of their rights by an absurd prejudice [perhaps he is thinking of actors here] and at the same time forgetting those rights when it comes to twelve million women?" (Condorcet)
      4.  "Now the rights of men follow only from the fact that they are feeling beings, capable of acquiring moral ideas and of reasoning about these ideas. Since women have the same qualities, they necessarily have equal rights," (Condorcet)
      5.  "Either no individual in mankind has true rights, or all have the same ones; and whoever votes against the right of another, whatever be his religion, his color, or his sex, has from that moment abjured his own rights," (Condorcet)
      6.  "It is said that women have never been guided by what is called reason despite much intelligence, wisdom, and a faculty for reasoning developed to the same degree as in subtle dialecticians. This observation is false: they have not conducted themselves, it is true, according to the reason of men but rather according to their own. Their interests not being the same due to the defects of the laws, the same things not having for them at all the same importance as for us, they can, without being unreasonable, determine their course of action according to other principles and work toward a different goal," (Condorcet)
      7.  "If one admits such arguments against women, it would also be necessary to take away the rights of citizenship from that portion of the people who, having to work without respite, can neither acquire enlightenment nor exercise its reason, and soon little by little the only men who would be permitted to be citizens would be those who had followed a course in public law," (Condorcet)
D.  Declaration on the Rights of Women and the Female Citizen
      1.  Olympe de Gouges's challenge to women to rise up and defend their rights
            a.  "Woman, wake up; the tocsin of reason is being heard throughout the whole universe; discover your rights," (de Gouges)
            b.  "Do you fear that our French legislators, correctors of that morality, long ensnared by political practices now out of date, will only say again to you: women, what is there in common between you and us? Everything, you will have to answer," (de Gouges)
      2.  A potential social contract is provided to be used between a man and a woman
E.  A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
      1.  Mary Wollstonecraft's multi-chapter piece on the rights women should have
      2.  One of the first lengthy treatises written for the benefit of women
F.  Similarities to the Protestant Reformation pamphlets
      1.  Revolutionary pamphlets were distributed to spread the word
      2.  Reformation pamphlets were one of the main reasons that Luther's reformation was able to take place
G.  Female Reactions
      1.  Discourse on the Injustice of the Laws in Favor of Men, at the Expense of Women
            a.  Etta Palm d'Aelders provides a more aggressive argument for gender equality
            b. "Justice must be the first virtue of free men, and justice demands that the laws be the same for all beings, like the air and the sun. And yet everywhere, the laws favor men at the expense of women, because everywhere power is in your hands,"  (d'Aelders)
      2.  List of Grievances and Claims of Women
            a. "The men persisted in making us victims of their pride and their injustice," (List of Grievances and Claims of Women)
H.  Male Reactions
      1.  Plea for Divorce and Women's Freedom
            a.  Lequino, a lawyer, gives a speech to the Legislative assembly asking for women's freedom
            b. "Among all nations women have lived so far in dependence on their husbands, or rather in a true state of slavery, still graduated over despotism in the political system of government," (Lequino)
      2.  Guyomar gives a speech to the National Convention about human equality
            a. "Freeing women from slavery withering humanity as we break the chains of our neighbors,"  (Guyomar)
I.  Women Taking Action
      1.  March on Versailles that was primarily attended by women
      2.  Society of Revolutionary Republic Women


WORKS CITED:
d'Aelders, E.P. (1790, December 30). Discourse on the injustice of the laws in favor of men, at the expense of women. Retrieved from http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/476/

de Condorcet, N. (1790, July). On the admission of women to the rights of citizenship. Retrieved from http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/292/

de Gouges, O. (1791). Declaration on the rights of woman and the female citizen. Retrieved from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1791degouge1.html

Declaration of the rights of man. (1789, August 26). Retrieved from http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.asp

Declaration of the rights of man and citizen. (1793). Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/~iw6/docs/dec1793.html

Declaration of rights and duties of man and citizen. (1795, October 26). Retrieved from http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/298/

Guyomar, . (1793, April 29). National convention speech on women. Retrieved from http://icp.ge.ch/po/cliotexte/xviiie-et-xixe-siecle-epoque-de-la-revolution-francaise/la-revolution-francaise


Olympe, de Gouges. (1791). Declaration on the rights of woman and the female citizen. Retrieved from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1791degouge1.html

Regulations of the society of revolutionary republican women. (1793, July 9). Retrieved from http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/481/

The oath of the tennis court. (1789, June 20). Retrieved from http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/tennis_oath.html

Wollstonecraft, Mary. (1792). A vindication of the rights of women. Retrieved from http://www.bartleby.com/144/

Friday, 4 March 2011

Industrial Revolution and Nationalism FRQ

THESIS:  This struggle for workers' rights inspired many governmental and national revolts during the years 1815 - 1848, and it was really the unity that emerged that would make these revolutions successful.
- Industrial Revolution revolts and rights
- Greek Independence
- Germany as a country (unsuccessful)


**During the Industrial Revolution, farming took a back seat to industry as new discoveries made mass-producing goods faster and more efficient.  John Kay produced a loom where two people could weave at the same time instead of one.  To keep up with that, the spinning jenny was invented to spin even more thread.  With more machines to produce more goods, the demands for goods grew, and so did the demand for workers.  In no time, these workers' rights started being taken away so that the employers could receive as much profit as possible.  As a result, the people rebelled to try and get their own rights.  This struggle for workers' rights inspired many governmental and national revolts during the years 1815 - 1848, and it was really the unity that emerged that would make these revolutions successful.
**Workers in the Industrial Revolution were not happy with the way they had to live.  They worked longer hours than they ever had for less pay.  Women and children even were forced to work excruciatingly long days in order to match the large quota their employer wanted.  As a result of this, the people formed things like labor unions and went on strike to try and get their rights back.  On top of this, Corn Laws were put in place to outrageously tax food.  The people were not getting paid enough to work ridiculous hours, and they had to give up a decent chunk of that hard-earned money in order to pay the tax on their grains.  People protested to both get rights for workers and to repeal the Corn Laws.  They used their unity to get their government to grant their wishes.  This strategy did end up working:  the government made factory owners give the workers decent pay, or minimum wage, laws were put in place to restrict the amount of hours women and children could work in a day, and Corn Laws were repealed with the help of Robert Peel.
**The Greek people echoed these thoughts of wanting their own rights later in the era of nationalism.  For the longest time, the Ottoman Turks had occupied and controlled Greece, but now the Greek people wanted their own freedom.  Fortunately for Greece, people in England, France, and Russia were not on very good terms with the Turks, so they were willing to side with Greek nationalists. Eventually, in 1832, Greece received its independence.  Three of the most powerful countries of that time had helped the Greeks to gain this independence.  By working together, they were able to kick the Ottoman Turks out and gain independence.  Similar to the Industrial Revolution, these different people banding together for a common cause and accomplished it with teamwork.
**Similarly, Germany tried to gain a legal unity within it separate states, left detached since the Holy Roman Empire dissipated.  They met at the Frankfurt Assembly to decide whether or not the German states should converge into one nation.  There were naysayers in Prussia called the Junkers, though, and a whole Germany was decided against in the Berlin Assembly.  Though this revolt did not succeed, this happened because of the lack of unity and agreement within Germany.  The Austrians were on one side of the debate, the East Prussians were on another, and the rest of the Prussians had yet another different opinion, while all the smaller principalities, though not as significant, also had their own opinions.  Though the same intent of the Industrial Revolution protests and the fight for Greek independence was there, the unity was not, therefore this was not  a successful attempt at nationalism.
**Through the power of teamwork, many groups throughout both the Industrial Revolution and the Age of Nationalism were able to overcome boundaries to gaining their own rights, whether they be workers or nationalists.  Other revolts of this time, on the other hand, were not successful because of the lack of unity.  The period from 1815 - 1848 was one littered with revolt after revolt, but the key to a successful revolt, as was started in the time of the Industrial Revolution and carried throughout liberalism, conservatism, and nationalism was agreement and togetherness.

Monday, 28 February 2011

Term Paper Outline

PURPOSE:  What is the main reason that caused women to take part in the French Revolution?

THESIS:  Women took part in the French Revolution primarily because of writings like Olympe de Gouges's Declaration on the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen and Nicolas de Condorcet's On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship; if not for women being educated by such publications, they would not have been inspired to participate in the revolution alongside the men.

DEFINITIONS:
Olympe de Gouges
Marquis and Sophie Concordet
Mary Wollstonecraft
Etta Palm d'Aelders

TYPES OF SOURCES:
Primary Sources:  June 20, 1789: Tennis Court Oath;  August 27, 1789: Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizen; 1793: Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen; 1795: Declaration of Rights and Duties of Man and Citizen; Nicolas de Concordet, July 1790: On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship;  Olympe de Gouge, 1791: Declaration on the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen;  Mary Wollstonecraft, 1792:  A Vindication of the Rights of Woman;  Various Revolutionary Pamphlets;  Various Protestant Reformation Pamphlets;  1789: List of Grievances and Claims of Women; Lequino, February 17, 1792: Plea for Divorce and Women's Freedom; Guyomar, April 29, 1793:  National Convention Speech on Women's Rights; Etta Palm d'Aelders, December 30, 1790: Discourse on the Injustice of the Laws in Favor of Men, at the Expense of Women;  Paris, France, October 5, 1789: Engraving of the Women's March on Versailles; July 9, 1793:  Regulations of the Society of Revolutionary Women;
Secondary Sources:  N/A at this current point in time

OUTLINE:
A.  Background on the French Revolution
      1.  Tennis Court Oath
      2.  National Assembly
B.  Documents for the Rights of Men
      1.  Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen 1789
      2.  Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen 1793
      3.  Declaration of Rights and Duties of Man and Citizen 1795
C.  On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship
      1.  Condorcet: A man who also believes that women deserve equal rights
      2.  Believed that women were certainly capable of exercising the same rights as men
D.  Declaration on the Rights of Women and the Female Citizen
      1.  Olympe de Gouges's challenge to women to rise up and defend their rights
      2.  A potential social contract is provided to be used between a man and a woman
E.  A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
      1.  Mary Wollstonecraft's multi-chapter piece on the rights women should have
      2.  One of the first lengthy treatises written for the benefit of women
F.  Similarities to the Protestant Reformation pamphlets
      1.  Revolutionary pamphlets were distributed to spread the word
      2.  Reformation pamphlets were one of the main reasons that Luther's reformation was able to take place
G.  Female Reactions
      1.  Discourse on the Injustice of the Laws in Favor of Men, at the Expense of Women
            a.  Etta Palm d'Aelders provides a more aggressive argument for gender equality
      2.  List of Grievances and Claims of Women
            a.  "Mrs. BB"  suggests that women represent women, as long as everyone gets equal say
H.  Male Reactions
      1.  Plea for Divorce and Women's Freedom
            a.  Lequino, a lawyer, gives a speech to the Legislative assembly asking for women's freedom
      2.  Guyomar gives a speech to the National Convention about human equality
I.  Women Taking Action
      1.  March on Versailles that was primarily attended by women
      2.  Society of Revolutionary Republic Women

Monday, 21 February 2011

Term Paper Thesis

Women took part in the French Revolution primarily because of writings like Olympe de Gouges's Declaration on the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen and Nicolas de Condorcet's On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship; if not for women being educated by such publications, they would not have been inspired to participate in the revolution alongside the men.

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Possible Term Paper Topics

- The role of women in the French Revolution
~ OR ~
- The causes and catalysts of the June Rebellion of 1832

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

Reflection on the French Revolution and Napoleon

In learning about the French Revolution and Napoleon, it shows just how much change one country can go through in such a short period of time.  In less than half a century, France went through multiple complete overhauls of their government.  They went from an absolute monarchy, to some form of a republic, with unicameral and bicameral assemblies, to having an emperor, all the while at war or at least on bad terms with the rest of Europe.  But, through it all, the country both lost and gained certain things, while in the end seeming to turn out better than the did before.

Sunday, 13 February 2011

Egyptian and French Revolutions

~ 1.  One of the biggest similarities between King Louis XVI of France and Husni Mubarak is the fact that they were both absolute rulers of their respective countries.  A difference is that, during Louis's reign, the country was in an economic crisis and heading quickly towards famine.  Also, in the time leading up to the French Revolution, Louis was married to Marie Antoinette, whom the people did not like at all (1).  The reason the people of Egypt revolted had more to do with discontent in Mubarak's reign itself (2).
~ 2.  One of the reasons the French Revolution started was because the people who had less land -- the Third Estate -- wanted to own more land, especially because they had the most people, as is human nature.  Stemming from this, there was also much competition for money among people.  The people with the most pand made the most money, causing social classes to develop and causing discord between these social classes (3).  In Egypt, one of the things that made the protests in Egypt as big as they were was the internet restrictions.  By restricting the rights of his people, Mubarak made them want to revolt even more (4).
~ 3.  In the French Revolution, women had a very large roll.  Olympe de Gouge's "Declaration on the Rights of Women" (5) began the progression of women's rights, and women played the largest roll in the march on Versailles in October 1789.  France was one of the first countries to strive toward gender equality, all starting during the Revolution.  In the Egyptian Revolution, many groups of both women and young people are surfacing.  These groups were in the streets along with all the men, protesting the government as well as raising awareness about things like sexual harassment (6).
~ 4.  After Louis XVI stepped down, the people of the National Assembly thought they had gotten what they wanted.  Instead, they got a violent period called the Terror, in which thousands of French citizens of all social castes were murdered (7).  There is a concern that this same result could occur in Egypt.  Though there is celebration now, if there happens to be a battle of power there is a good chance violence could ensue.
~ 5.  During the French Revolution, the Third Estate protested by holding their own National Assembly and writing things like the Tennis Court Oath (8) and the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen (9) to try and change their country's constitution.  During this recent Egyptian Revolution, people protested in large crowds in Tahrir Square, for the most part more peaceful than the protests could have been (10).
~ 6.  Though the protest did get somewhat violent before Mubarak stepped down, they were not as violent as they could have been.  There were a few deaths, but there were no giant massacres of Egyptian citizens.  Now, there is hardly any violence at all, mostly just celebrating after Mubarak has stepped down (11).
~ 7.  Now that President Mubarak has stepped down from office, instead of protests going on in the street, there are celebrations.  Scores upon scores of people are celebrating their successful overthrowing of their leader.  According to reporters currently in Egypt, everyone has high spirits and happiness from their success (12).
~ 8.  It is very likely that the Egyptian Revolution can work out much better than the French Revolution.  Mubarak stepped down more eagerly than Louis XVI, so the people are very please about that.  As of yet, nothing as devastating as the Terror has occurred, so the outlook for Egypt is looking much better than that of France.  There does not seem to be any struggle for power occurring, and hopefully it will stay that way.  On the other hand, if things get too violent, the Egyptian Revolution could take a turn for the worse and end up like the Terror of the French Revolution.

Works Cited
(1) Campan, M. (1818). Memoirs of the private life of marie antoinette. Retrieved from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1818marieantoinette.html
(2) Hosni mubarak. (2011, February 11). The New York Times, Retrieved from http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/hosni_mubarak/index.html?inline=nyt-per
(3) Turgot, ARJ. (1775). Reflections on the formation and distribution of wealth. Retrieved from http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/turgot/reflecti
(4) Mackey, R. (2011, January 26). Egyptian bloggers report on new unrest [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/egyptian-bloggers-report-on-new-unrest/
(5) de Gouge, O. (1791). Declaration on the rights of women. Retrieved from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1791degouge1.html
(6) Martin, Michel (Writer). (2011 February 4). Women play vital roll in egypt [Radio series episode]. (Executive producer), National Public Radio.
(7) Robespierre, M. (1790). Justification of the use of terror. Retrieved from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/robespierre-terror.html
(8) The oath of the tennis court. (1789, June 20). Retrieved from http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/tennis_oath.html
(9) Declaration of the rights of man. (1789, August 26). Retrieved from http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.asp
(10) Anti-government Protesters Fill Cairo's Tahrir Square on Tuesday. 2011. Photograph. Cairo, Egypt. Egyptian Protests Leave 3 Dead. CBC News, 25 Jan. 2011. Web. <http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2011/01/25/cairo-egypt-protest-tunisia.html>.
(11) Goldman, P. (2011, February 11). A party for the ages in tahrir square [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/02/11/6034857-a-party-for-the-ages-in-tahrir-square
(12) Egypt's protests on twitter. (2011, January 27). Retrieved from http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/201112523026521335.html

Thursday, 10 February 2011

French Revolution and The Terror

THESIS:  Though in the end the Terror seemed to have solved many problems of the French Revolution, there was no need to resort to all the violence and killings that occurred in this time period; important figures in the Revolution at that time, the opinion of the general public, and execution statistics of the Terror show how devastating this time was, and how France would have benefited more had this much violence not been used.

  • Statistics
    • Document 1
    • Document 2
    • Document 3
  • Important Figures
    • Document 4
    • Document 6
    • Document 7 (disagree)
  • General Public
    • Document 9
    • Document 10
    • Document 12
    • Document 13

**During the French Revolution, the time of Terror was, as its named suggests, a time of much turmoil and death in the whole of France.  Throughout the whole of these massacres and be-headings, though, many different reforms were instituted for the better of France as a whole.  Policies were put in place and government orders were changed in order to please as many of the subjects as possible in an attempt to stop the murder.  These reforms and whatnot would later be very beneficial to France after eventually stopping the Terror.  However, this was not the best way the citizens could have gone about trying to change France.  Though in the end the Terror seemed to have solved many problems of the French Revolution, there was no need to resort to all the violence and killings that occurred in this time period;  important figures in the Revolution at that time, the opinion of the general public, and execution statistics of the Terror show how devastating this time was, and how France would have benefited more had this much violence not been used.
**Statistically, the death toll in the whole of France was outrageous.  By the end of the terror, 2639 people had been killed in the city of Paris alone.  In the entire country of France, over 11000 people had fallen victim to the devastation of the Terror.  Even worse, these deaths were among people of all different social classes: nobles, middle class, peasants, every class imaginable in France was effected by the Terror (doc. 2).  Some territories of France -- Vendee and Lyon, for example -- had over 400 executions take place (doc. 1).  And even aside from this caste system they already had, with these differing view points as part of the Revolution, France was even more divided than it had ever been.  Throughout all of France people were pitted against one another, siding with the enemy, siding against the state, maybe not even allying themselves at all (doc. 3).  The Terror of France caused much discord within France, and unfortunately the one thing that all castes and opinions had in common was a large death toll.
**As people began to see how devastating the Terror was, many important figures, whether revolutionaries or people of the state just wanted it to stop.  Camille Desmoulins, a journalist and former ally of Maximilien Robespierre, wrote, "You want to remove all your enemies by means of the guillotine?  Has there ever been such great a folly?" (doc. 6).  She goes on to say that these people doing the killings were murdering so many innocent people for no good reason, and the really brave ones are the ones that have unfortunately perished.  She, like many others, realizes what a terrible idea something like the Terror is, and how much more efficient discussing matters peacefully would be.  Charles James Fox, reformist member of Parliament and sympathizer with the French Revolution, said in a speech to Parliament, "What a pity that a people capable of such incredible energy should be guilty or rather be governed by those who are guilty of such unheard of crimes and cruealties," (doc. 4).  He believes that the people of France do indeed have the potential for greatness, but they are putting this potential at risk by killing all of their enemies.  Even as a sympathizer of the French Revolution, he believes that murder is not the way to solve problems.  On the other side of the argument, Maximilien Robespierre says in a speech to the National Convention, "To good citizens revolutionary government owes the full protection of the state; to the enemies of the people it owes only death," (doc. 7).  This was the violent mindset for the people in favor of the Terror.  Though Robespierre did have supporters at first, people eventually realized that his ideas were not logical and would only cause harm, so they took power away from him.  People, like Desmoulins, Fox, and those who demoted Robespierre, were completely right in saying how useless it was to go around killing people in order to try and make a better France.
**Even the insignificant general public came to learn that the Terror was a terrible idea.  They were indeed in favor of it at first, though, in the January 28, 1794 report to the government on public opinion, which said, "The majority of the citizens agreed unanimously saying that the tribunals act well, that they acquit the innocent and punish the guilty," (doc. 9).  But even in this same report it goes on to say, "Murmurs are heard among the public at their judgements," (doc. 9).  These people murmuring were the ones who had the right idea about the Terror and that it should be stopped.  Just a month later in the next report to the government, it was written, “Bitter complaints already expressed numberless times, were repeated today of the arrest and 
imprisonment of citizens who are good patriots and are victims of ambition, cupidity, jealousy, and, in 
short, every human passion," (doc. 10).  More and more people are beginning to rightly realize that killing people is not the best solution to any problem.  Even more discontent was brewing the next month.  The next report said, "On seeing peasants on the scaffold, people said, What, have these wretches allowed themselves to be corrupted?" (doc. 12).  By now they are certain that people in charge during the Terror were, as the said corrupted.  Lastly, on March 30, it was reported, "The revolutionary committees are every day falling into discredit," (doc. 13).  By now almost all of the general public knew how bad of an idea the Terror was, and they all just wanted it to stop.
**Though there were solutions that came from the Terror within the French Revolution, these solutions could have arisen from much more peaceful means.  As statistics, important figures, and the general public all agree, murder and massacre are not the way to solve problems.  Though it took some a little longer to come around then others, eventually nearly everyone was able to see that they should have come up with better alternatives to solve their problems.

Sunday, 6 February 2011

Candide Thesis and Outline

Pangloss, being an optimist, and all those who follow his philosophy provide better company than one who is a pessimist and enjoy a happier life because of their outlook on it.
  • Pangloss's optimistic philosophy
    • There is no effect without cause
    • Everything has sufficient reason
    • It is impossible for anything to be different because everything is right just the way it is
  • Disaster leads to better things
    • Candide was banished from the castle, but was not a victim of the siege that later befell it; if he had not been banished and the castle had not been ransacked, he may have never been reunited with Pangloss, Comgonde, Paquette, or Cunegonde's brother
    • If Candide had not stabbed Cunegonde's brother, the Oreillions that later captured him would have roasted and eaten him and Cacambo
    • If Candide and Cacambo had not gotten lost and just let the river carry them, they would have never found El Dorado, the City of Gold, and gotten the funds to fund their journey
    • In the end, "If you had not been kicked out of a magnificent castle for the love of Miss Cunegonde: if you had not been put into the Inquisition: if you had not walked over America: if you had not stabbed the Baron: if you had not lost all your sheep from the fine country of El Dorado: you would not be here eating preserved citrons and pistachio nuts," (chapter XXX)
  • General happiness
    • Because he believed that everything was the best possible thing that could happen, Pangloss's own hanging, though he did not die, could not have been sad for him, because he knew it was for the best; even after being hanged, cut open, whipped, etc., he still professed that everything was for the best.
    • Though the old woman that Cunegonde befriends had had a hard life of slavery and abuse, she was still glad to help reunite Candide and Cunegonde
    • Despite all his setbacks, Candide never lost hope that he would be reunited with Cunegonde, and in the end he did end up marrying her